Caesar augustus biography book

But as dictators go, Augustus is about as good as you can get and after the wars he set about to reforming and rebuilding the Empire. He left it in 14 AD much better then he found it. Beyond Augustus' story, I was impressed with the character of Marcus Agrippa. Agrippa achieved great things in his own right and it is doubtful Augustus could have been so successful with Agrippa next to him.

In a time of everyone competing for the top, it was amazing to me Agrippa remained loyal his entire life. He had no problem doing great things and giving credit to Augustus. I think we all could use an Agrippa by our sides throughout life. It was also interesting to learn about how Augustus would have been referred. I always heard him as "Octavian" until he became "Caesar Augustus".

But after Julius Caesar's death, when Octavian was adopted as his son, he went by "Caesar. Finally, for those interested in Christian faith, there is an interesting appendix on the birth of Jesus. It was refreshing to read a historian with no skin in the game write on this. I have no idea what Goldsworthy's faith is, but he clearly is not trying to prove anything, like most Christians and skeptics who approach this text.

He notes difficulties and probabilities and moves on. Overall, a very interesting and engaging piece of historical biography. Yair Zumaeta Acero. Miranda Alford. Agrippa is a legend and is underrated. Good overview of Augustus' actions but nothing extra. It exists tbh. I also looked like an absolute tragedy because was reading this at the tennis job and everyone else was reading light stuff.

Steven Peterson. Author 19 books followers. I am not an expert in Roman history, so I cannot speak to the accuracy of this work. However, I am, in the end, impressed by the work. First, the author has an extensive background in Roman history, having written an excellent biography of Julius Caesar, as well as works on battles and military matters.

Second, he does not seem to me to go beyond the evidence. At any number of points, he notes that we cannot know what happened, although he sometimes makes an informed guess some biographers have gone way too far with these "guesses"; Goldsworthy seems to be more discreet. Third, there are a number of maps, some rather indifferent and others useful.

I wonder if there could not have been somewhat more and somewhat better. Fourth, the political structure of Rome is described quite nice3ly, including a confusing array of posts that could be held by leaders. The unlikely story of Caius Octavius who became Augustus is well told. Goldsworthy begins with what we can gather about his youth--and the extraordinary good luck of having been adopted by his great-uncle Julius Caesar.

The background of the first triumvirate--Pompey, Crassus, and Caesar--is discussed and the end of their alliance at the top of the dominance hierarchy of Rome. After Caesar's assassination, the dynamics of Roman politics changed dramatically. How Octavius became Augustus and survived the aftermath is, again, a well told tale. A second triumvirate developed--Marc Antony, Lepidus, and Octavius.

There was much tension among them, and a falling out seems to have been inevitable. The process by which Augustus emerged as Roman leader is told in considerable detail. Then, the long career of Augustus as Princeps is related. This is, again, done nicely. There was much pain in his life, as so many close to him died early. We learned of key figures, such as Agrippa, who helped his leadership and accomplishments.

His personal life, as much as can be ascertained, adds a human element to this biography. This is a fine biography. I am impressed that so many years later, one could assemble as detailed a story as emerges here. Augustus was the nephew and adopted son and heir of Julius Caesar. As such he led one of the factions in the civil war that followed Caesar's murder and emerged as sole ruler from 27BC, ruling the empire for forty years.

Augustus skilfully developed the role of emperor, co-opting the major families and politicians of Rome into a system that proved stable for the four decades of his rule. He expanded the empire, reformed the state and encouraged massive investment and huge public works to make Rome an imperial city. He operated with skill and bravery, was lucky at times and extremely ruthless when it was necessary.

Augustus exploited the desperate need for order following the deprivation of the civil war, refashioning the political system as sole ruler whilst outwardly following many of the traditions of the Roman republic. He was lucky in that he had excellent associates such as Agrippa and Maecenas - he was in truth not the best general -who ably assisted him in his task of ruling a massive state.

Goldsworthy does a great job in setting out the life of one of the greatest Romans. He shows us how a callow youth rose from one of several competing warlords through a combination of luck, skill and guile to become supreme leader of Rome. He also shows us how Augustus managed to stay in control for forty years, and how he mellowed and adapted to rule the state whilst masking the brutal fact that he was essentially a military dictator - allowing the other Roman clans a stake in the system.

Worth a read. Scipio Africanus. Adrian Goldsworthy is undoubtedly one of the best Roman historians of recent years. Never a dull moment and always great insight. Im a Julius Caesar guy, but I can see why he adopted Octavian. When in Rome His early career was as a warlord, using the wealth he had inherited and borrowing extensively to ensure that he had the largest army as the Roman republic descended into civil war.

Adrian Goldsworthy is a recognised scholar of ancient Rome and has a doctorate from Oxford University in ancient military history. Although this is a period I know nothing about, it quickly becomes clear that the book has been thoroughly researched. While concentrating on Augustus himself, Goldsworthy takes time to set his story well into the period, giving plenty of information about the period before Augustus rose to prominence, so that the newcomer gets a real feeling for the society that he was operating within.

As always with histories of so long ago, the source documents are limited and often even they were written a considerable time after the events. Goldsworthy acknowledges this and reminds the reader of the effect of contemporary and later propaganda on the picture left behind of such a prominent figure as Augustus. This meant that I found the book very accessible and only very rarely felt that I was floundering a bit.

Personally there was a bit too much concentration on the military side of things for me. He shows Augustus as a slick political operator rather than a heroic warrior — in fact, there is a clear suggestion that Augustus tended to fall conveniently ill and retreat to the rear whenever the fighting hotted up. However he seems to have been ruthless in pursuit of his aims, willing to change allegiance whenever he thought it would benefit him and displaying a high degree of brutality towards his defeated enemies - behaviour all the more remarkable, perhaps, given his youth.

Considering the difficulties of lack of source material, I felt Goldsworthy gave a fairly rounded picture of Augustus — a man whose behaviour seemed, as Goldsworthy says, to improve as he got older. The man who in his youth cheerfully proscribed his enemies and had them killed seemed willing to show a little more tolerance in his old age — though not always to his own family.

I got the distinct impression that Goldsworthy was being kinder to Augustus than some of his critics may have been over the years. Overall, this is a well written book, accessible enough for a casual reader with little or no pre-existing knowledge of the period; but with enough depth and detail to be interesting to people more familiar with this part of history too.

Este libro me ha ayudado demasiado para conocer, por primera vez y a profundidad, al primer emperador romano. James Langley. A very solid read. The book does a good job of describing the culture of Rome during that time period and how Augustus shaped the way the empire was ruled long after his death. Author 34 books followers. Densely packed with information and analysis, written in a clear style and a consistent narrative pace, I found the whole account balanced and eminently readable.

Augustus is such an important figure; a ruthless warlord who brought peace, a clever political operator, propagandist, but energetic and dedicated, a writer, wit, autocrat, a family man, but as unfaithful as any Roman man of the period. He was blessed in having the highly intelligent Livia as his wife and Agrippa as his staunch supporter. I do wonder if his reign would have been so successful without them.

One impression that came through was he chose to live a reasonably modest life and did not seek honours; on the contrary he seemed refuse them at every step. Perhaps he was just being clever, or perhaps he was genuine, but there was no doubt of the level of commanding power he exerted for a remarkable number of years. The family trees and maps were well integrated into the book.

I had seen many of the places and artefacts in the plates, but they were a very welcome reminder. You will all be satisfied. In his Caesar biography, his focus in the first part was primarily Cicero. Octavian was just 13 years old when Caesar crossed the Rubicon and commenced the Civil War, and he was just 19 when he became the youngest consul in the history of the Roman Republic.

With meticulous research and a keen eye for detail, Syme presents a vivid and compelling narrative that brings the world of Augustus to life. Throughout the pages of this Augustus Caesar book, Syme explores the various challenges and triumphs that Augustus faced during his reign. From his rise to power after the assassination of Julius Caesar to the establishment of the Roman Empire, Syme unravels the complex web of political intrigue and power struggles that marked this pivotal period in Roman history.

His prose is both scholarly and accessible, making it a perfect read for both history enthusiasts and casual readers alike. In conclusion, Augustus: The Roman Revolution is a remarkable book that offers a comprehensive and captivating account of the life and reign of Augustus Caesar. With its engaging narrative and meticulous research, this book is a must-read for anyone seeking to understand the complex world of ancient Rome and the influential figure who shaped it.

This magnificent book on Augustus Caesar provides a comprehensive exploration of the man behind the myth, shedding light on the intricate web of politics, power, and ambition that surrounded his ascent to the throne. Galinsky expertly weaves together historical facts, anecdotes, and cultural insights to offer readers a vivid portrait of Augustus Caesar, the enigmatic figure who transformed the Roman Republic into the mighty Roman Empire.

With meticulous detail, he explores how Augustus skillfully navigated the treacherous waters of Roman politics, forging alliances and eliminating rivals along the way. This book about Augustus Caesar goes beyond mere biography, delving into the cultural and social context that shaped Augustus and his times.

Caesar augustus biography book

Galinsky explores the complex relationship between Augustus and the Roman people, highlighting his efforts to establish himself as a revered and beloved leader. By examining the political and religious reforms implemented by Augustus, the author provides valuable insights into the profound impact he had on Roman society. Through meticulous research and a masterful storytelling approach, the author brings to life the key events, influential figures, and complex dynamics that shaped this pivotal era in history.

By examining his relationships with family, friends, and advisors, readers are given a glimpse into the human side of Augustus, providing a more nuanced perspective on his motivations and actions. Looking for a captivating read about the legendary Augustus Caesar? This remarkable book delves into the life and reign of the renowned ruler, offering an in-depth exploration of his rise to power, his political genius, and his enduring legacy.

Discover how he strategically navigated the treacherous world of Roman politics, outmaneuvering his rivals and solidifying his authority. Experience the triumphs and challenges of his reign, from the establishment of the Pax Romana to his ambitious building projects. But this book is not just a dry retelling of historical events.

It offers a fascinating glimpse into the character and personality of Augustus Caesar, exploring the complex man behind the title. Immerse yourself in the world of ancient Rome, where power, ambition, and destiny collide. Are you fascinated by the life and legacy of the great Roman Emperor? Look no further! Robert C. Through vivid storytelling and insightful analysis, this book provides a comprehensive understanding of the man who transformed Rome from a republic into an empire.

Discover how Augustus strategically navigated the treacherous waters of politics, war, and power, leaving an indelible mark on the history of Western civilization. Woodman Sallust is, I believe, the earliest Roman historian of whom substantial works survive. He was also a senator. They brought his body to Rome, and there was a very, very tense situation.

The oligarchs thought the murder of Clodius was a heroic act; the Roman people were absolutely furious. They rioted and burned down the senate house. Sallust was tribune at that very time, and had to organize the trial for the murderer of Clodius and make sure he was condemned. It was very difficult to do, but he did it. Later he served under Caesar, but ingloriously: as governor in north Africa he was clearly lining his own pocket, and was disgraced.

So his political career was not particularly distinguished. I can be fair to both sides. Sallust started his monographs on recent history in 42 or 41 BC, just at the time when the triumvirs, including the future Augustus, had been empowered by the Roman people to make war on Brutus and Cassius and destroy them. Catiline made out that he was the leader of the Roman people against the oligarchs.

He was a pretty thuggish, cynical character himself, as Sallust makes clear. Catiline left Rome and put himself at the head of it. Sallust writes about the final battle, with Catiline commanding a group of self-armed rustics. Some of them were veterans, and still had some weapons and armor, but most of them were armed with pitchforks. But at the end, he says, not one of those men was found with wounds in the back.

They stood and fought together, because they were desperate. Sallust is very, very even-handed about the two of them. At the time he was writing, the issue was still open. Nobody knew then that Antony and the young Caesar would succeed in defeating Brutus and Cassius at Philippi. Later, Sallust moved on to his second big work, The Jugurthine War.

He says that the effect of that arrogance, and the popular reaction to it, was the polarized politics that had been so disastrous that even in his own time there were still civil wars and devastation in Italy. This second monograph probably dates to 41 BC, when there was indeed a mini-civil war in Italy in which the city of Perugia was destroyed.

Sallust is writing as an ex-senator, but also as a historian, consciously trying to be fair to both sides. At the same time, he is absolutely clear that the responsibility for the corruption of the republic and the decline into civil war lies mainly with the oligarchy. In both monographs, Sallust has little digressions in which he explains what it was all about, and how things had come to pass.

They spent their money, such as they had, on honouring the gods. He dates this to , when the city of Carthage was finally destroyed in the third and last of the Carthaginian Wars. That led to all sorts of other vices, which is how he explains the origin of the corrupt aristocracy. For avarice undermined trust, probity and all other good qualities; instead it taught men arrogance, cruelty, neglect of the gods and to regard everything as for sale.

So he sees the very success of the Roman republic as bringing about the creation of a ruling clique who simply thought that the world was theirs, that they were entitled to it and could exploit it for themselves, not only abroad but also at home. That meant throwing out small farmers in order to create great estates for themselves. When, in BC, a tribune of the plebs called Tiberius Gracchus protested against this and brought in legislation to prevent it, they beat him to death in a public assembly.

No one was brought to trial for it. That was the origin of polarized politics between what we would call the right and the left. The left in Roman terms were the populares , traditionalists who wanted the republic to belong to the people as a whole. It led to a polarized, partisan politics that was simply uncontrollable. Once you get away with murder—as the oligarchs did with Tiberius Gracchus—the next stage is invading the country.

That happened in 88 BC, when Lucius Sulla solved a political dispute by bringing his army into Rome and making himself dictator. The late republic is a period we know incredibly well—better than any other period in the whole of the history of the ancient world—because we have an astonishing number of surviving works of Cicero. We know Cicero, who was a slightly older contemporary of Sallust, extraordinarily well.

And although Cicero started off as a popularis when he was a young senator making his way, he moved steadily to the right. He was one of the oligarchs himself. Not one of the brutal ones he was a very civilized man , but he took it for granted that the right of the political spectrum was the right place to be. The danger is that they simply internalize his political assumptions.

This is a funerary inscription that Augustus wrote himself, is that right? No, not funerary. What we happen to have is this text that Augustus chose to compose, probably six months to a year before he died. We know it from a copy—both in the original Latin and in a Greek translation—that was inscribed on the walls of a temple at Ancyra modern Ankara in the province of Galatia now central Turkey and discovered and transcribed in the 16th century.

And it includes the famous quote, about how he exceeded others in influence, but had no greater power. If you look at the inscription, what he says right at the beginning, the very first thing he wants us to know, is this:. Much later, in the penultimate chapter 34 , he writes:. For this service I was named Augustus by senatorial decree, and the doorposts of my house were publicly clothed with laurels, and a civic crown was fastened above my doorway, and a golden shield was put up in the Julian senate house.

Personally, I believe he was suffering from Fibromalgia, something for historians to explore further, perhaps. A well-written and absorbing book with a few issues. I found the going boring a little at times, a dryness escaping the pages that I felt a wish to spice up! A biography of a man of contradictions, though of course, are we not all a collection of contradictions?

I think anyone wanting to know more, and not put off by my own admiration for Augustus I know, but I do feel he is under rated, under appreciated and not nearly celebrated enough. If Caesar had ruled for forty years after his conquest of Gaul and seizing of the dictatorship, perhaps he would have been as under-celebrated as well. Heroes die young, after all.

The winners change the world and die in their beds as old men. Augustus was the greatest winner in history that we know. A book worth reading, I promise! A man worth knowing about, I guarentee! Sam Eccleston. This book is difficult to review. It has many fascinating passages; Bleicken is clearly a master historian. The problem with it is it's length; one feels that most of the chapters could be made significantly shorter without any of their import being lost.

The author's style is like that of many German stylists: curiously ponderous, with a lot of seemingly pointless repetition. Additionally, while you get a real sense of what it was that Augustus did, you get very little sense of how or why. In other words, the man himself is obscured by his deeds; what was it about him that allowed him to exercise such influence?

Was he charming or intimidating? Was he a master of back-room deals, blackmail, or was he just lucky? We are given very little sense of what the answers to these questions might be in most of the book. An overall very informative and balanced overview of the life of Augustus. Great book! The latter part of the book was highly interesting and fun to read.

I will say the start of the book, particularly the first pages, are incredibly clunky and stale to read, but nonetheless I would recommend to anyone interested in Augustus. William Southwell-Wright. Author 1 book 6 followers. Peter Briggs. Extremely informative and clear. Amazing scope and depth - a comprehensive account. Translation leaves something to be desired and not an easy read.

This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.